For years I write my letters centering on the 2013 RNWT revision of Leviticus 5:1 and the Sept.1 1987 Wt. article "A Time to Speak When?" starting after the Barbara Anderson essay "Flawed Decrees Conceal Criminals". They go to publishers homes [ although no more as in June I got call from US Postal Inspector and local police, that they were threats, once the shunning issue brought up they realized that I was just fucking with the minds], Kingdom Hall doors, AMA, Pennsylvania DA, Jewish University, local Bible university, etc, just what you would expect from a religious kook.
I post here, just a religious kook.
The point I TRY to make is that the Sept.1 1987 Wt. article "A Time to Speak When?" is unique among the many deceptions has authored in that this article was a highly engineered deception designed to fabricate a Gestapo informant hunting license for the purpose of ferreting out apostates. But the 2013 revision of Lev.5:1 has been cloaked in silence [as indeed it is new light] . I The argument I put forth is that Gestapo informant policy is a major engineered deception hence the question. When set along side of the blood policy what degree of murder is the church guilty of by their withholding from families of whom forfeiture of human life is enforced by being being DAed and loss of family by the shunning policy the information that the church uses deception as a means to create policy?
In business fraud is defined as "the falsification of a fact OR the omission of a fact. So for the church to revise Lev.5:1 in 2013 and keep that "new light" secret, what moral, ethical or legal responsibility do they have to inform families that are being confronted by dire medical decisions that the church uses deceptions to fabricate a non biblical informant policy in light of the sanctions of loss of family by means of being DAed and shunned?
The Wt. article "A Time to Speak When?" was written in 1987!!! It was part of a package deal which was brought into being in 1984. That package consisted of and started with; the obedience to the Organization mantra, the emergence of a brand new enemy "the apostate", the brand new sanction "shunning". These new policies were completely foreign in the pre1975 church. This package was the transition from the Matt. 24: 34 singular era to the "sacred mystery" era of Matt. 24: 34 and "master delayed" slave transition Matt. 24: 48-51.
Barbra Anderson's essay "Flawed Decrees Conceal Criminals" is a major research paper that sheds light on the 2013 revision of Lev.5:1! It is under appreciated. I am NOT taking anything away from Barbara's reputation [I personally view her molestation work to be the cornerstone of the fall of the JW church] but Barbara has a wart, she will mine a male for information to advance her position as #1 Apostate, then hang the source of information out to dry and twist in the wind.
To stand the DAing and shunning blood transfusion policy next to the 2013 RNWT revision of Lev.5:1 is a much greater revelation than Deut. 22:25-27 stood next to the "two witness policy" of Deut. 19:15!
The issue is MURDER!
Yours truly a "kook" Eccl.9:13-16